Conversation
|
Looks like only a few extrinsics changed on swc. Some random samples should still be checked manually to see if there are bugs in swc. The only one that really asymptotically increased is the |
| .saturating_add((47_366_000 as Weight).saturating_mul(v as Weight)) | ||
| // Standard Error: 40_000 | ||
| .saturating_add((240_000 as Weight).saturating_mul(d as Weight)) | ||
| .saturating_add((48_208_000 as Weight).saturating_mul(v as Weight)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Big jump up of weight value
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The git diff is a bit confusing here, but parameter v is nearly the same as before.
Paramete d got kicked out. This is only a very small increase.
| (4_943_000 as Weight) | ||
| // Standard Error: 2_000 | ||
| .saturating_add((3_798_000 as Weight).saturating_mul(c as Weight)) | ||
| (11_289_000 as Weight) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The constant component does not really matter here compared to the component c.
c goes up to 1000 for this benchmark. SWC will soon take the correct slope maxima into account to simplify these comparisions.
* polkadot: update weights * kusama: update weights * westend: update weights * rococo: update weights
* polkadot: update weights * kusama: update weights * westend: update weights * rococo: update weights

this PR will also be backported to the current release branch once reviewed & merged